During the 2000s, however, business processes grew complex. EDI’s limitations became apparent in the dynamic and diverse supply chain ecosystems of the 2010s. Businesses with EDI deployments found it difficult to adapt to the requirements of their new partners. Moreover, the technology’s P2P topology and batch-processing architecture emerged as cumbersome bottlenecks.
And yet, here we are today in a world where EDI continues to power 75% of B2B commerce. Clearly, EDI has stood the test of time. Some of its advantages cannot be achieved with newer alternatives, which nonetheless, help businesses overcome the shortcomings of legacy EDI deployments.
This is what makes EDI modernization a lucrative undertaking. EDI modernization can help organizations turn the technology into fast, flexible, and adaptive communication railroads that B2B commerce requires in today’s digital economy.
Not convinced yet? See why EDI modernization is essential for modern B2B organizations today, how to do it successfully, and the key advantages you can expect through such an initiative.
Legacy EDI: where it falls short
Older EDI tools typically pose technical and functional challenges that hinder the desired business outcomes. Here are some of the key areas in which legacy EDI solutions fall short:
Birlasoft Enterprise Integration Services
Seamless Integration. Unifying Possibilities
1. Lengthy onboarding processes: AMS provides continuous monitoring to identify and resolve issues to ensure high availability and optimal performance. AMS providers employ advanced tools and techniques to track key performance indicators, system logs, and user behavior patterns, enabling early detection of anomalies, bottlenecks, or potential vulnerabilities.
2. Rising cost of on-prem systems: Legacy EDI systems are typically deployed as on-prem solutions which require dedicated server and network infrastructure. Maintaining these deployments requires mandatory upgrades and maintenance, which incurs additional costs without any significant value-back. This raises the TCO of the solution.
3. Technical shortcomings: Older EDI solutions do not support modern technologies like APIs and Managed File Transfer (MFT). These are often critical to implementing real-time data interchange, which is essential to modern, dynamic trade networks.
4. Integration challenges: Integrating legacy EDI systems with modern solutions like ERPs can prove challenging, requiring custom connectors and increasing maintenance overheads. In some cases, businesses resort to swivel-chair manual data entry, which increases the risk of data inconsistency, reduces operational efficiency, and creates data silos.
5. Lack of visibility: Lastly, legacy EDI solutions do not offer transaction-level visibility. This makes it difficult to monitor and troubleshoot supply chain issues and track the status of transactions. Ultimately, these gaps manifest as long resolution times, delayed orders, and suboptimal experience for trade partners and supply chain teams.
Despite these shortcomings of legacy EDI systems, the technology remains a crucial enabler of B2B commerce across global trade networks. Why is this the case?